Open to review?
The Faulks panel may prove to be a convenient fig leaf to allow government to override the rule of law
Gross injustice at the Court of Justice
A British lawyer is fighting her dismissal in a Kafkaesque post-Brexit judicial quagmire
Jury’s out
Reducing jury trials would reduce the legal backlog, but at what cost?
A very private affair
Even without the Human Rights Act, our judges would have developed a new law on privacy by now
Stinger stung
A professional gambler who sued for £7.7 million has unwittingly led the Supreme Court to redefine honesty
British QC begins legal action against EU
If the EU can sack court members — judicial independence will become meaningless
Open justice? Case closed
The law governing the reporting of family court hearings should be relaxed for the sake of transparency
No, the standard of proof has not been changed
Peter Hitchens and the Mail on Sunday claim that a core principle of our legal system has been changed without debate – they are wrong
Why Lord Sumption is wrong about the coronavirus shutdown
Joshua Rozenberg says lockdown measures are a price worth paying
Supremely impartial
Far from being enemies of the people, our judges have a fine record in ignoring political considerations when making their rulings