Judicial Review
The case against judicial review
British proceduralism has hamstrung British ambition and innovation
The Northern Ireland Protocol partly repeals the Act of Union
The High Court in Belfast confirms the Protocol’s constitutional vandalism. We will settle this in the Supreme Court
Most Read
Gary Stevenson is wrong about wealth taxes
The popular economist is irritating, but more importantly he is mistaken
Why they hated Ann Widdecombe
Fair-minded people could agree or disagree with her opinions. Left-wing bigots hated her for not abandoning them
What is wrong now was wrong before
Julia Gillard should not pretend that the “unintended consequences” of the gender debate were unknowable
Ethnic minorities are abandoning Labour
It is not just Muslim voters who have been abandoning the Labour Party
Wrestling with realignment
Labour will use the Irish Sea border as an excuse to realign with the EU’s rules
Dear Prudence
A reflection on the Tory Party’s historic suspicion of interventionism
Women should not have to apologise for their rights
There is nothing cruel about women wanting single-sex spaces
The real problem with rigmarole
A journalistic focus on proceduralism distracts us from deeper political questions
Plant sentience
Pollination, long treated as a largely mechanical transaction, begins to look more like a dialogue
The book awards are a joke
The panel of non-literary judges shows just how frivolous the Nibbies are
The judge’s verdict
Much of what is passed off as sport is no such thing
The Islamopopulist march continues
Overshadowed by the Reform and Green surges, the Muslim vote continues a long march through the corridors of power
The ankle tag and the ballot box
The courts convicted Marine Le Pen, but left her political fate to French voters
The pro-nature case for regulatory reform
England’s environmental regime hasn’t delivered a restoration of nature — only decline, delay, and bureaucracy
