ECHR

The case for opposing withdrawal is currently intellectually fatuous

Britain’s political debate is now debating migration, sovereignty and law enforcement on terms that would have been unthinkable a decade ago

There are serious arguments against leaving the ECHR but this is not one of them

Keir Starmer and David Lammy are committing themselves to incompatible ideas

Both left and right have shifted on the issue of the European Court of Human Rights

Parliament, not the courts, is the place where decisions should be made

We must yet wait with bated breath for her to (possibly) announce a policy Reform has already adopted

So many undeserving cases are let in, yet a genuine Christian was blocked

We should stop pretending that moral disagreements can be reduced to technical debates

We do not need human rights law to protect human rights or to maintain the rule of law