Manchesterism
Who pays for Manchesterism?
Burnham spent nine years extracting money from Westminster, now he’ll be reaching directly into taxpayers’ pockets
What difference does he make?
Andy Burnham is not the answer to our woes because Burnhamism is not replicable
Most Read
Why they hated Ann Widdecombe
Fair-minded people could agree or disagree with her opinions. Left-wing bigots hated her for not abandoning them
Amnesty irrational
Gender identity ideologues cannot get away with baseless smears any more
A chaplain’s vindication
The case of Dr Bernard Randall has exposed the rot in our institutions
The myth of banned books
If transgression is fun and easy, it is probably not transgressive
The case against recognising Somaliland
The Somaliland lobby is being dangerously naive about the realities of the region
London vs the rest of the country
The publishing industry should aim to be more provincial and less metropolitan
Failing to face the facts
The Tories’ rosy view of their recent election drubbing reveals a reluctance to have the tough intellectual debate needed to secure the party’s future
Why did India ban this film?
“Satluj” is an important film and its suppression is unjust
Labour’s battle of egos
There is little love left to lose between those plotting regicide in Downing Street
Spectres of folk
Can the gallery embrace unofficial culture?
Facing demons
On the highs and lows of demonic infestation
The problem with scapegoating social media
Social media has become a convenient whipping boy for Britain’s political class
In defence of division
We cannot allow oikophobes and iconoclasts to define what it means for us to be united
Manchesterism is dead in the water
Andy Burnham already appears to have abandoned hope for meaningful change
Today Havering, tomorrow Westminster
The local elections exposed a political class united mainly by its inability to feel embarrassment
The screaming spires
Oxford University must clarify where it stands on academic freedom